COMMENTS:
How is Dr Zakir Naik a
security threat ?
1-
Because he has fire-arms in his possession? No,
he has no fire-arms.
2- Because he is a world martial artist in
self-defense? No, he does not know any Kungfu.
3-
Because he is a great scholar? Because he is
a huffaz and learn the Quran by heart? That is no crime for that.
4-
Because he know more of the Hindu texts than
any great Hindu preacher? So what is wrong with that.
5-
Because he know more of the Bible texts than
any great Christian preacher? So what is wrong with that.
6-
Because in his talk, a few Hindus and
Christians and non-believers converted to Islam? So what, have you ever heard of the concept “Freedom
of Religion”. That means any person can convert to any religion he/she wants.
7-
Don’t be a sole loser and opportunist, and
rid a great scholar (Dr Zakir Naik) – just because you are a no body). Just
admitted it that Dr Zakir Naik is a great scholar !!
8-
Millions of people (Muslims and non-Muslims)
supported him, and are big fans of Dr Zakir Naik – So do not banned him just
because a few people are sole losers and jealous !!! The courts and government must NOT listen and entertain this kind of few people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source:
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/activists-file-civil-suit-demanding-zakir-naiks-arrest
Activists file civil suit demanding Zakir Naik’s arrest
BY ZURAIRI AR
KUALA LUMPUR, March 1 — A group of 19 human rights activists filed a civil suit against the Malaysian government today, accusing it of failing to protect the country from controversial televangelist Dr Zakir Naik.
The suit, among others, sought a government declaration that Dr Zakir was a threat to national security, called for a ban to prevent him from entering the country, and for him to be arrested and deported immediately.
The group, comprising plaintiffs from different religious and ethnic backgrounds, said Dr Zakir was an "undesirable person" and "a preacher of hate" who was currently roaming free in Malaysia.
“This application is not meant to insult or question the teachings of Islam and/or insult the feelings of any parties whether Muslim or not, Zakir Naik’s fans, or observers of his speeches,” the group’s spokesman, P. Waytha Moorthy, read to the press from an affidavit.
“There’s nothing on Islam, we’re strictly going on the issue of national security. Strictly on that,” added Waytha Moorthy, who is also chairman of the Hindu Rights Action Force, or Hindraf.
Besides Waytha Moorthy, the 19 plaintiffs included academic Dr Lim Teck Ghee, Sabah lawmaker Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan, lawyers Siti Kassim and Asiah Abd Jalil, and Sarawak activist Peter John Jaban.
Other reliefs sought by the plaintiffs include a declaration that Dr Zakir is a threat to country’s security, unity as well as the peaceful and harmonious co-existence of its various faiths and races.
Among the evidence the group included to support its case was the involvement of three Bangladeshi students involved in the July 2016 Dhaka bombings, who were students of Monash University between 2012 and 2015.
At least two of the five attackers had publicly said they were inspired by Dr Zakir’s teachings, and the group pointed out that the preacher had conducted eight public speeches in Malaysia between 2012 and 2016.
Although the application called for an order for Dr Zakir to be arrested and deported, the group did not provide any proof that the preacher is currently residing in Malaysia, save for his recent public appearances such as in Shah Alam and Perlis.
The four defendants named in the suit were Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, the Immigration Department director-general, the National Registration Department director-general, and the Government of Malaysia.
Although a fugitive in India, Deputy Home Minister Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamed said the controversial Islamic preacher is free to travel in Malaysia because he is not on any security watch list here.
Activists speak to members of the media at a press conference after filing a civil suit on Dr Zakir Naik at the Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex March 1, 2017. — Picture by Zurairi AR -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
Source: 24 June 2017
http://m.utusan.com.my/berita/mahkamah/didakwa-halang-tugas-pegawai-jawi-1.496339
Didakwa halang tugas pegawai Jawi
Siti Kasim berdepan hukuman penjara, denda maksimum RM10,000
KUALA LUMPUR 23 Jun - Peguam dan aktivis, Siti Kasim mengaku tidak bersalah di Mahkamah Majistret di sini hari ini atas pertuduhan menghalang tugas pegawai penguat kuasa Jabatan Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan (Jawi), tahun lalu.
Siti Zabedah Kassim
Pemilik nama sebenar Siti Zabedah Kasim, 54, didakwa menghalang tugas Siti Nor Jihan Saleh @ Md. Ghazali, 36, daripada menjalankan tugasnya di dewan tingkat dua, sebuah hotel di sini pada pukul 10.30 malam, 3 April 2016.
Wanita tersebut didakwa mengikut Seksyen 186 Kanun Keseksaan yang memperuntukkan hukuman penjara sehingga dua tahun atau denda maksimum RM10,000 atau kedua-duanya, jika sabit kesalahan.
Pendakwaan dikendalikan oleh Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Siti Hajar Mohd. Ashif manakala Siti Kasim diwakili peguam-peguam Roger Chang Weng Keng dan Rajsurian Pillai.
Siti Hajar tidak mencadangkan sebarang ikat jamin terhadap wanita itu, bagaimanapun barisan peguam memohon anak guam mereka dibebaskan dengan bon jaminan tanpa cagaran dengan alasan dia memberi kerjasama penuh sepanjang siasatan dan tiada kemungkinan untuk melarikan diri pada prosiding akan datang.
Majistret Ahmad Solihin Abd. Wahid membenarkan Siti Kasim diikat jamin RM3,000 dengan seorang penjamin dan menetapkan 22 Ogos ini untuk sebutan. Siti Kasim membayar jaminan.
Terdahulu, ketika kes itu dipanggil, Rajsurian memohon mahkamah membenarkan anak guamnya berdiri di luar kandang tertuduh dengan alasan untuk menghormati profesion Siti Kasim sebagai peguam.
Siti Kasim kemudian berdiri di luar kandang sepanjang prosiding tersebut selepas permohonan peguamnya dibenarkan oleh mahkamah.
Kira-kira 30 individu dipercayai penyokong peguam itu hadir dan berkumpul di lobi mahkamah seawal pukul 8.45 pagi sebelum naik bersama tertuduh.
Tahun lalu, satu klip video wanita itu memarahi beberapa pegawai Jawi menjadi tular selepas pasukan penguatkuasa berkenaan dipercayai menyerbu satu majlis yang turut dihadiri tertuduh.
.
