FREEDOM OF SPEECH / FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION


FREEDOM OF SPEECH / FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak without censorship and/or limitation. The synonymous term freedom of expression is sometimes used to indicate not only freedom of verbal speech but any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used [United Nations, 1966, 1976]. The right to freedom of speech is recognized as a human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The ICCPR recognizes the right to freedom of speech as "the right to hold opinions without interference. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression". Furthermore freedom of speech is recognized in European, inter-American and African regional human rights law [United Nations, 1966, 1967]. Freedom of speech, or the freedom of expression, is recognized in international and regional human rights law. The right is enshrined in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights [Andrew Puddephatt & Hodder Arnold, 2005; Kumar, Ambika, 2006].

In Islamic ethics freedom of speech was first declared in the Rashidun period by the caliph Umar in the 7th century. In the Abbasid Caliphate period, freedom of speech was also declared by al-Hashimi (a cousin of Caliph al-Ma'mun) in a letter to one of the religious opponents he was attempting to convert through reason.

According to George Makdisi and Hugh Goddard, "the idea of academic freedom" in universities was "modelled on Islamic custom" as practiced in the medieval Madrasah system from the 9th century. Islamic influence was "certainly discernible in the foundation of the first deliberately-planned university" in Europe [Boisard, Marcel A., 1980].

* Selected REFERENCES / Sources:


Amnesty International: Annual Reports: URLhttp://www.amnesty.org/ailib/aireport/index.html Andrew Puddephatt & Hodder Arnold. (2005). Freedom of Expression: The Essentials of Human Rights. United Publishers. Boisard, Marcel A. (July 1980), "On the Probable Influence of Islam on Western Public and International Law", International Journal of Middle East Studies 11 (4): 429–50. Goddard, Hugh. (2000). A History of Christian-Muslim Relations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Kumar, Ambika. (2006). ‘Using Courts to Enforce the Free Speech Provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.’ Published by Chicago Journal of International Law. Summer 2006. URLhttp://www.allbusiness.com/corporate-governance/4082846-1.html United Nations: ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.’ Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16th December 1966: Entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49. URLhttp://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm (United Nations) Wikipedia. (2010). ‘Freedom of Speech.’ Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. URLhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_expression

.

24 April 2015

2015 Malaysia Richest People !



Source: Intelligent Money Sdn Bhd
https://www.imoney.my/articles/top-10-richest-men-in-malaysia-2015?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=content-paid&utm_campaign=iMoneyMY


2015 MALAYSIA RICHEST MEN !

“Sugar King” Robert Kuok, safeguarded his number one position in the list, saw his net worth slipped by US$200 million (RM722 million) last year due to the plunge in commodity prices to US$11.3 billion.
Likewise, Ananda Krishna, maintained his second position but saw a drop in wealth from US11.3 billion to US$9.7 billion.
There have been some changes in net worth and placements in the list, with two new faces in the top 10 list: Goh Peng Ooi, the first technopreneur to hit the top 10 with US$1.6 billion (an increase of US$0.5 billion from last year) and Lee Oi Hian & Lee Hau Hian, who saw their net worth spike from US$1 billion to US$1.5 billion.
This year, four new contenders joined the top 50 list: real estate tycoon Khoo Cheng Hai, packaging specialist Lim Teck Meng of Scientex Bhd, oil-ship fabricator tycoon Ng Chin Heng of Coastal Contracts Bhd, and co-founder of United Overseas Australia Ltd, Kong Chong Soon.
The minimum net worth required to be eligible for the list this year is US$240 million, up from US$220 million a year ago.
Some of the tycoons who saw their net worth slipped due to the sluggish stock market and slump in oil price are Tan Sri Mokhzani Mahathir, an investor in O&G services provider SapuraKencana Petroleum Bhd, by US$700 million, and the Tan Sri Shahril Shamsuddin and Tan Sri Shahriman Shamsuddin, the main investors in SapuraKencana, by US$860 million.










07 April 2015

USAH TAASUB KEJAR RANKING !


Source:
http://www.hmetro.com.my/node/42051?m=1

Usah taasub kejar ranking

Oleh Mohd Hasbi Sidek
Shah Alam: Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) disaran supaya tidak terlalu taasub mengejar kedudukan (ranking) universiti di peringkat dunia sebaliknya perlu memberi lebih tumpuan menghasilkan penuntut berkemahiran.
Ketua Pengarah Pendidikan Tinggi Prof Datuk Dr Asma Ismail berkata, kedudukan sesebuah universiti tidak menentukan kualiti sesebuah institusi pengajian tinggi itu.
“Ingin saya tekankan di sini, UiTM jangan terlalu taasub dengan ‘ranking’ dunia kerana ia hanya satu permainan negara barat.
“Warga UiTM perlu memberi lebih tumpuan kepada seni yang dapat menggambarkan budaya dan tradisi masyarakat negara ini melalui penuntut berkemahiran dalam bidang dipelajari,” katanya ketika ucapan perasmian Majlis Penutupan Program Rumah Gemilang dan Pelancaran Buku Induk Rumah Gemilang di Menara Sultan Abdul Aziz, UiTM Shah Alam, di sini, semalam.
Projek Rumah Gemilang yang dibiayai Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia itu bertujuan menaik taraf hidup penduduk setempat khususnya di Sabak Bernam, Selangor, menerusi pendekatan kesenian dan keusahawanan menghasilkan seramik kraf.
Sementara itu Dr Asma berkata, modul penuntut, pensyarah dan alumni Jabatan Seramik Perindustrian, Fakulti Seni Lukis dan Seni Reka (FSSR), UiTM Shah Alam itu mampu melonjakkan nama institusi berkenaan.
“Saya percaya warga universiti ini berjaya mengharumkan nama mereka dengan penghasilan penuntut dan pensyarah berbakat dalam bidang masing-masing.
“Selain itu, kementerian bersedia membuka jalan dan peluang perniagaan kepada usahawan yang dihasilkan melalui program ini serta berharap UiTM memberi tumpuan serius,” katanya.
Dalam pada itu peserta program Khairul Azhar Ashaari, 37, berkata, program itu memberi impak positif kepadanya serta peserta lain kerana dapat mempelajari ilmu kemahiran berkenaan.
“Kami bukan hanya dapat mempelajari kemahiran membuat seramik malah ia secara tidak langsung dapat membuka peluang perniagaan,” katanya.
Artikel ini disiarkan pada : 
Selasa, 7 April 2015 @ 9:34 AM







05 April 2015

Tun M, tolong berhenti kritik Najib demi kepentingan peribadi - Lokman Adam !


Source: http://www.astroawani.com/berita-politik/tun-m-tolong-berhenti-kritik-najib-demi-kepentingan-peribadi-lokman-adam-57097


Tun M, tolong berhenti kritik Najib demi kepentingan peribadi - Lokman Adam


KUALA LUMPUR: Bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad diminta menghormati pentadbiran Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak dan tidak menghentam Perdana Menteri untuk mencari pengaruh serta populariti demi kepentingan keluarga sendiri.

Panel Pemikir Jabatan Hal Ehwal Khas (Jasa) Lokman Noor Adam berkata, ‎pelbagai pertikaian Dr Mahathir kepada Najib disifatkan tindakan terdesak yang mempunyai maksud tersirat selain memenuhi impian politik peribadi.

"Dari hari ke hari kita lihat, serangan ke atas Najib oleh Dr Mahathir semakin menjadi-jadi.  Yang terkini,  pemberian wang bantuan 1Malaysia (BR1M) kepada mereka yang mempunyai pendapatan isi rumah RM4,000 ke bawah juga dipertikainya.  Memang tidak mudah untuk kepimpinan UMNO menjawab Dr Mahathir.

‎"Siapa juga yang cuba mempersoalkan keterlanjuran Dr Mahathir, sudah pasti menempah keranda dalam karier politik mereka kerana terpaksa berhadapan dengan ribuan penyokongnya yang menganggap Dr Mahathir sebagai seorang yang maksum umpama nabi.

"Memandangkan karier politik saya pun dah mati bila tewas dalam pemilihan Naib Ketua Pemuda UMNO lalu dan bekas pemimpin PKR memang sukar untuk bertapak semula dalam UMNO, biarlah saya membakar diri menyatakan apa sebenarnya disebalik usaha Dr Mahathir ini," katanya ketika menghubungi Astro AWANI di sini hari ini.

Lokman mengulas‎ mengulas kenyataan Dr Mahathir yang menyifatkan tidak akan bertemu Najib untuk membincangkan kritikannya kepada negara melalui blognya.

Kata Dr Mahathir, tempoh perbincangan senyap sudah berakhir selain mengakui sudah berjumpa Najib sebelum ini dan kini mengambil jalan terakhir iaitu mendedahkan isu berkenaan.

Terdahulu, Dr Mahathir menyatakan pemberian BR1M merupakan satu kesilapan besar yang dilakukan kerajaan.

Minggu lalu, Dr Mahatir melalui blognya turut mendesak Najib untuk menentukan nasib serta masa depan UMNO.‎

‎Kata Lokman, setiap pemimpin ada cara tersendiri bagaimana mereka ingin mengurus ekonomi negara.

"Seperti  di zaman Dr Mahathir,  salah satu pendekatan yang digunakan untuk merangsang ekonomi ialah dengan menyelamatkan syarikat-syarikat besar.

"Saya masih ingat, Dr Mahathir selalu menyebut, "bila kita bantu syarikat-syarikat besar ini, mereka akan dapat membayar gaji pekerja-pekerja mereka dan mereka juga akan memberikan pulangan kepada kerajaan dengan membayar cukai".

"Itu cara Dr Mahathir dan kerana itu jugalah bila Datuk Seri Anwar pada masa itu tidak mahu meluluskan penggunaan dana Petronas sebanyak RM 2 bilion untuk menyelamatkan MISC, yang punya kaitan dengan Mirzan Mahathir, Anwar akhirnya dipecat," ujarnya.

Tegasnya, walaupun diakui  Anwar seorang peliwat,  tetapi kalau betul Dr Mahathir tidak boleh menerima seorang peliwat untuk menggantikannya, sudah pasti dari tahun 1993 lagi Anwar sudah dipecat olehnya bila Tun Hanif Omar, Ketua Polis Negara ketika itu memaklumkan tentang tabiat luar tabii Anwar.

"Tetapi Dr Mahathir tidak pernah kisah soal moral insan yang setia bersamanya ketika itu.  Dr Mahathir hanya bertindak ke atas Anwar apabila Anwar enggan membantu Mirzan yang terganggu emosinya ketika itu akibat kegawatan ekonomi pada1997 sehingga1998.

"Memang tidak dapat dinafikan, pemecatan Anwar juga berpunca daripada tindakan juak-juak Anwar yang sudah mengatur langkah untuk menabalkan Anwar sebagai Presiden UMNO.

"Di bawah kepimpinan Najib, dia tidak menggunakan pendekatan yang diambil Dr Mahathir.  Lagipun, jika RM5 bilion disuntik kepada syarikat-syarikat besar ini, berapa peratus sangatlah yang akan dinikmati oleh kakitangan syarikat-syarikat tersebut berbanding dengan pemberian BR1M yang terus diberikan kepada mereka yang benar-benar susah dan memerlukan," jelasnya.

Kata Lokman lagi, matlamatnya juga sama iaitu meningkatkan kecairan dipasaran selain tiada beza pun dengan matlamat Dr Mahathir.

" Cuba kita tanya kepada mereka yang menerima BR1M tahun lepas, siapa yang masih menyimpan duit BR1M mereka? Saya yakin semuanya sudah habis dibelanjakan untuk membeli barang keperluan harian mereka.  Jika mereka membeli sayur, ianya akan merangsang industri pertanian, jika ianya digunakan untuk membeli daging, ianya akan merangsang industri penternakan dan begitulah seterusnya.

"Dr Mahathir bukan hendak jawapan pada persoalan BR1M, 1MDB, Altantuya, Shirul mahupun jet yang turut dia dan Tun Siti Hasmah gunakan semasa menjadi Perdana Menteri ketika kegawatan ekonomi dahulu.  Isu tersebut hampir semuanya sudah  dijawab dan Dr Mahathir bukanlah seorang yang malas membaca," katanya.

Oleh itu jelasnya, apa yang menyebabkan Dr Mahathir gelabah hari ini adalah apabila dia melihat beberapa tokoh politik seangkatan dengannya sudah meninggal dunia.

"Dr Mahathir tahu yang masanya juga akan sampai dan dia kekurangan masa kini.  Sebagai seorang bapa yang cukup menyayangi anaknya, Dr Mahathir membuka laluan perjalanan politik untuk anaknya Mukriz dengan cukup baik.

"Setiap Perdana Menteri selepasnya dianggap hanya 'Calon Sementara' sebelum Mukriz dapat ditabalkan sebagai Perdana Menteri.  Tempoh masa yang diberikan juga sekitar lima tahun supaya dia sempat memastikan Mukriz berpeluang duduk di kerusi nombor dua sebelum dia meninggal dunia," katanya.

Lokman turut memberi pesan kepada Dr Mahathir agar mengingat kembali ayat yang selalu disebut dahulu iaitu, "Kalau nak tegur pemimpin, tegurlah mengikut saluran.  Kalau marah dengan seekor nyamuk, janganlah satu kelambu dibakar".‎

" Kalau Dr Mahathir terus memberi peluru kepada pembangkang untuk membenamkan Najib, saya risau bukan hanya Najib yang akan tumbang, tetapi Barisan Nasional (BN) juga akan tumbang sebagai parti memerintah.

" Apa guna kalau ketika itu kita ada Presiden UMNO yang baru, tetapi kita sudah tidak punyai kuasa.  Masa itu,  bukankah anak Dr Mahathir sendiri juga salah seorang yang akan berputih mata?"  jelasnya.

23 March 2015

LEE KUAN YEW DIES AT 91


Source:  http://www.nst.com.my/node/77522

Lee Kuan Yew dies at 91

23 MARCH 2015 @ 8:21 AM

SINGAPORE: Lee Kuan Yew, who founded modern Singapore and was both feared for his authoritarian tactics and admired for turning the city-state into one of the world’s richest nations, died today, the government said. He was 91.
Lee was admitted to Singapore General Hospital on Feb. 5 for severe pneumonia and was later put on life support.
The Prime Minister’s Office said in a statement posted on its website that Lee “passed away peacefully” at the hospital at 3.18 am Monday.
The country’s first and longest-serving prime minister, Lee guided Singapore through a traumatic split with Malaysia in 1965 and helped transform what was then a sleepy port city into a global trade and finance centre. Although he could have remained in office for much longer, he stepped aside and handed over leadership of the ruling party, and the country, to a younger generation in 1990. Still, he remained an influential behind-the-scenes figure for many more years until his health deteriorated.
“In the end, my greatest satisfaction in life comes from the fact that I have spent years gathering support, mustering the will to make this place meritocratic, corruption-free and equal for all races — and that it will endure beyond me, as it has,” Lee said in his 2013 book, “One Man’s View of the World.”
President Barack Obama once called Lee “one of the legendary figures of Asia in the 20th and 21st centuries.”
“He is somebody who helped trigger the Asian economic miracle,” Obama said after meeting Lee at the White House in October 2009.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said he was “deeply saddened” by Lee’s death. He noted that Singapore is marking its 50th anniversary of independence this year, and “its founding father will be remembered as one of the most inspiring Asian leaders,” according to a statement released by Ban’s spokesman.
Ban said Lee helped Singapore “transition from a developing country to one of the most developed in the world, transforming it into a thriving international business hub.”
Lee’s legacy includes an efficient government with little corruption, low tax rates to attract foreign investment, excellent schools and clean and safe streets, all of which have helped Singapore rank consistently near the top of surveys of the most livable cities for expatriates.
He faced criticism, though, for using tough tactics to consolidate power. He jailed some political rivals without trial for decades and brought defamation lawsuits against journalists and opposition politicians, which had a chilling effect on dissent.
Lee insisted that strict limits on free speech and public protest were necessary to maintain stability in a multiethnic and multi-religious country that witnessed race riots in the 1960s. That stability, he added, was needed to enable growth and raise living standards in a country with few natural resources.
“I had to do some nasty things, locking fellows up without trial,” Lee said in an interview with The New York Times published in September 2010. “I’m not saying everything I did was right. But everything I did was for an honorable purpose.”
Lee, whose People’s Action Party has ruled Singapore since 1959, remained a powerful adviser with Cabinet minister status after stepping down as prime minister, and many Singaporeans, particularly older ones, viewed him as a wise, if strict, father figure.
Lee gave up his Cabinet minister post and resigned from the executive committee of the People’s Action Party after 2011 parliamentary elections in which the ruling party won its lowest overall vote percentage since independence.
One of his sons, Lee Hsien Loong, is Singapore’s current prime minister. He also is survived by another son, Lee Hsien Yang, and a daughter, neurologist Lee Wei Ling. His wife of more than 60 years, Kwa Geok Choo, died in October 2010.
Born Sept. 23, 1923, Lee grew up speaking English in a Singapore that was part of the British colonial empire, and was known as Harry during much of his early life. His university education was interrupted by the three-year Japanese occupation of the island in World War II, a time Lee said he learned how power could be wielded.
“The Japanese demanded total obedience, and got it from nearly all,” he wrote in his memoirs. “My appreciation of governments, my understanding of power as the vehicle for revolutionary change, would not have been gained without this experience.”
After completing his studies at Singapore’s Raffles College, Lee went to England to study law at Cambridge University. There, he married Kwa, a fellow student, in 1947. He returned to Singapore in 1950 and started the law firm Lee & Lee with his wife in 1955.
In 1954, Lee helped found the People’s Action Party in alliance with communist trade unionists — whom he would later break with — and he became Singapore’s first prime minister in 1959 when Britain granted it self-governance in all matters except defense and foreign affairs.
Singapore declared independence from Britain in 1963, and Lee, believing his island couldn’t survive alone, brought it into the federation of neighboring states that became Malaysia. But the Malay leadership asked Singapore to leave after two years because of ideological differences. Lee wept on national television while announcing the breakup, which he later would call one of his biggest political regrets.
He then turned to governing his tiny island state, imposing strict policies that some saw as micromanaging the daily lives of Singaporeans. Lee outlawed the sale of chewing gum, promoted English and Mandarin while banning other Chinese dialects from public schools, radio and TV. He also enforced ethnic integration by controlling the makeup of public apartment buildings, where 80 percent of the population lives.
“I say without the slightest remorse, that we wouldn’t be here, we would not have made economic progress, if we had not intervened on very personal matters — who your neighbor is, how you live, the noise you make, how you spit, or what language you use. We decide what is right. Never mind what the people think,” Lee said in 1987.
Lee also cracked down on organized crime and imposed harsh penalties for minor infractions, a policy that has helped Singapore maintain one of the world’s lowest violent crime rates.
Drug couriers face mandatory hanging, vandals are sometimes caned — such as American teenager Michael Fay in 1994 despite a plea for leniency from President Bill Clinton — and litterbugs must pay a hefty fine.
Lee stayed active in his later years, commenting on domestic and international affairs and representing Singapore on frequent trips abroad.
The Prime Minister’s Office said arrangements for the public to pay respects and for the funeral proceedings will be announced later. --AFP


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMENTS:

Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew professes practicing democracy, yet his leadership style tells a different story.

1- He would JAIL political rivals without trial.
2- He would LIMIT freedom of speech.
3- He would not allow the Chinese community to speak other than Mandarin and English.
4- Mandatory hanging for drug offences.

[Note: Facts above are taken from the official source of NST, and the confession by Lee himself - nothing new is added !].


Now the premiership is headed by his son, LEE Hsien Long... Scholars and political activists would termed this 'father-son leadership' or association as Nepotism and Cronyism.  

So the question now is - Can the political system in Singapore can still be called 'democracy' ????

The US President and UK Prime Minister should advise the LEE's families on the 'correct' understanding and practices of the concept/term of Democracy !! This is the least they can do when they meet in the FUTURE!

AND the young generations of Singaporeans must standup for the TRUTH and speakup for JUSTICE!!


The USA Dollar ?!





The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind (Documentary) - Hidden Secrets of Money 4 | Mike Maloney

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0






21 March 2015

40 ORANG TERKAYA DI MALAYSIA (2014) !


Source: http://www.pakdi.net/40-orang-terkaya-di-malaysia-2014/



40 Orang Terkaya di Malaysia 2014


1. Robert Kuok (Kerry Group / Kuok Group) RM 54 bilion
2. T Ananda Krishnan (Usaha Tegas) RM 33 bilion
3. Tan Sri Teh Hong Piow (Public Bank) RM 18 bilion
4. Tan Sri Quek Leng Chan (Hong Leong Group) RM 14 bilion
5. Tan Sri Lee Shin Cheng (IOI Group) RM 13 bilion
6. Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar AlBukhary (Albukhary Foundation), RM 11 bilion
7. Tan Sri Lim Kok Thay (Genting) RM 9.4 bilion
8. Puan Sri Lee Kim Hua (Genting) RM 7.5 bilion
9. Datuk Mokhzani Mahathir (SapuraKencana Petroleum) RM 4.2 bilion
10. Tan Sri Azman Hashim (Amcorp Group) RM 4.1 bilion
11. Tan Sri Tiong Hiew King (Rimbunan Hijau) RM 3.8 bilion
12. Ong Beng Seng (Hotel Properties Ltd) RM 3.5 bilion
13. Tan Sri Yeoh Tiong Lay (YTL Group) RM 3.2 bilion
14. Tan Sri Lau Cho Kun (Hap Seng Consolidated) RM 3.1 bilion
15. Tan Sri Shahril Shamsuddin (Sapura Group) RM 2.5 bilion
16. Tan Sri Shahriman Shamsuddin (Sapura Group) RM 2.4 bilion
17. Tan Sri Jeffrey Cheah Fook Ling (Sunway Group) RM 2.2. bilion
18. Datuk Lee Yeow Chor (IOI Group) RM 2 bilion
19. Lee Yeow Seng (IOI Group) RM 2 bilion
20. Tan Sri Vincent Tan Chee Yioun (Berjaya Group) RM 1.9 bilion
21. Tan Sri Lee Oi Hian (Batu Kawan) RM 1.7 bilion
22. Datuk Lee Hau Hian (Batu Kawan) RM 1.7 bilion
23. Tan Sri Tony Fernandes (Air Asia) RM 1.4 bilion
24. Tan Sri Francis Yeoh Sock Ping (YTL Group) RM 1.3 bilion
25. Tan Sri Dr Lim Wee Chai (Top Glove) RM 1.3 bilion
26. Datuk Yeoh Seok Hong (YTL Group) RM 1.3 bilion
27. Datuk Michael Yeoh Sock Siong (YTL Group) RM 1.3 bilion
28. Datuk Yeoh Seok Kian (YTL Group) RM 1.2 bilion
29. Datuk Kamarudin Meranun (Air Asia) RM 1.2 bilion
30. Tan Sri Ong Leong Huat & Khor Chai Moi (OSK Holdings) RM 1.2 bilion
31. Datuk Mark Yeoh Seok Kah (YTL Group) RM 1.2 bilion
32. Puan Sri Chong Chook Yew (Selangor Properties) RM 1.2 bilion
33. Tan Sri Leong Hoy Kum (Mah Sing Group) RM 1.1 bilion
34. Ngau Boon Keat (Dialong Group) RM 960 juta
35. Datuk Tan Heng Chew (Tan Chong Motors) RM 902 juta
36. Datuk Seri Stanley Thai Kim Sim (Supermax) RM 690 juta
37. Datuk Abdul Hamid Sepawi (Ta Ann Holdings) RM 603 juta
38. Datuk Tony Tiah Thee Kian (TA Enterprise) RM 589 juta
39. Tan Sri AK Nathan (Eversendai) RM 573 juta
40. Tan Sri Rozali Ismail (Puncak Niaga) RM 543 juta
Berdasarkan penilaian Malaysian Business sehingga 18 Januari 2014. Anggaran dibuat berdasarkan pegangan saham di dalam syarikat tersenarai dan pegangan persendirian yang dapat dikenal pasti pemilik. 











23 December 2014

THE BIGGEST GAINERS BILLIONAIRE !



(23 DEC2014)


Gainers:
 
Rank #1 - Jack Ma [ALI BAB]
Net Worth in Dec 2013: $10.7 billion
Net Worth in Dec 2014: $29.2 billion
Gain: $18.5 billion, +173 percent

Rank #2 - Warren Buffett [WALMART]
Net Worth in Dec 2013: $59.1 billion
Net Worth in Dec 2014: $72.6 billion
Gain: $13.5 billion, +23 percent

Rank #3 - Bill Gates [MICROSOFT]
Net Worth in Dec 2013: $72.6 billion
Net Worth in Dec 2014: $83.1 billion
Gain: $10.5 billion, +14 percent

Rank #4 - Mark Zuckerberg [FACEBOOK]
Net Worth in Dec 2013: $24.7 billion
Net Worth in Dec 2014: $33.1 billion
Gain: $8.4 billion, +34 percent

Rank #5 - Patrick Drahi [TELECOMMUNICATION]
Net Worth in Dec 2013: $7.8 billion
Net Worth in Dec 2014: $12.9 billion
Gain: $5.1 billion, +65 percent